“This includes content referring to climate change as a hoax or a scam, claims denying that long-term trends show the global climate is warming, and claims denying that greenhouse gas emissions or human activity contribute to climate change.”
This is in preparation for the coming United Nations and World Economic Forum pushing the Climate Emergency Hoax into the forefront of media hysteria. It is a weapon of the Great Reset, as is the Forever Virus, the Cyber Meltdown and Dissent.
More from Google:
In creating this policy and its parameters, we’ve consulted authoritative sources on the topic of climate science, including experts who have contributed to United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Reports. As is the case for many of our policies, we’ll use a combination of automated tools and human review to enforce this policy against violating publisher content, Google-served ads, and YouTube videos that are monetizing via YouTube’s Partner Program. We’ll begin enforcing this policy next month.
The Introduction of global warming/climate change meme by the UN in 1992, called Agenda 21. The United Nations described Agenda 21 as follows:
“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.
Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.
The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.
The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.”
The key to Agenda 21 falling short was the lack of the yet to come Big Tech/Big Data/Deep Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence element that would come in the mid 2010s.
One of the major proponents of Agenda 21 – and one world governance – is the Rockefeller Foundation. As Agenda 21 laid stagnant, the Foundation put this report out in 2010:
One of the most interesting early findings of the plutocracy plan for a takeover comes in the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 document titled “Rockefeller Foundation – Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development 2010”
As we can see once we read this document, their future scenario IN THIS DOCUMENT FROM 2010, is brought about by a global pandemic that ushers in a new order. In fact, this future scenario is the catalyst used to bring about “more authoritarian control” which ‘sticks’ and even “intensifies”. (WOW.) Here are the highlights , but link is above if you want to read the whole document. The report titledScenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development has a stated goal of creating “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” “A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues… An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge… An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems.” Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. It is also a fine example of predictive programming. In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen. This document expresses 4 scenarios:1) Lock Step — Tighter Top Down Government Control and Growing Citizen Pushback 2) Hack Attack — Unstable Shock Prone World In Which Criminals Thrive 3) Smart Scramble — Economically Depressed World With Make Shift Solution To Ever Growing Problems. 4) Clever Together — A Highly Coordinated Global Government Where Successful Strategies For Solving All Problems Emerges. The scenario “Lock Step”, one of four included in a publication called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society. Remove such obstacles as ‘individual rights’ and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation states. (remember, this was written in 2010): “A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.” The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. First and third world nations alike follow suit by “flexing their authority” and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other “airtight rules and restrictions” – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.” “This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who “willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight.” “Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. It takes over a decade for people to “grow weary” of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.” Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many scientists, statesmen, and alternative media, have raised the alarm about coronavirus. Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus “rumors,” and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. (I am not saying this is or is not true. I just find it interesting that you can not find ANY of this information online anymore. Don’t you find that odd?)
Remember, this document is looking at a future scenario from its publish date of 2010,which was ten years ago. The Rockefeller Foundation paints a disturbing picture, a future pandemic that kills 8 million people in just seven months. (Looking at the present, the Coronavirus has not killed anywhere near that number. Most of those who died from Coronavirus had chronic health issues to begin with.
More in the document: “The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” More scenarios in the document:“Without Government Intervention Virus Spreads” “The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.” Translation: In the absence of an authoritarian government, the virus was able to spread. By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation is embracing and promoting authoritarian government. In their scenario, they are seeking to remove the rights of the people in order to prevent the virus from spreading. In their mind, during a Pandemic or other similar event, the government must overturn the law and become authoritarian. That all becomes even more clear as we continue to analyze this document. In developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. In the mind of the Rockefeller Foundation, our Constitution amounts to “leniency”. Therefore, our Constitution should have been suspended, and replaced with authoritarian government in order to contain the spread of the future virus. This is a clear violation of our basic God-given rights. (remember, this was written in 2010). More from the document: “Authoritarianism Will Contain Virus Outbreak” “However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.” The globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. However, this is exactly what happened in China! They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit. By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism, which is authoritarianism protecting the people. Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, “it’s for the good of the people”. In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people. From the 2010 document: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.” (ummmm, sound familiar?) If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now. “Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.” Not only will these authoritarian controls remain according to the Rockefeller Foundation, but they will intensify. That means our freedom and rights will continue to be removed, not just in the United States, but globally. (Have you heard of “The Great Reset” yet? Read my other post linked at the top). “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
As we can see, their future scenario IN THIS DOCUMENT FROM 2010, is brought about by a global pandemic that ushers in a new order. In fact, this future scenario is the catalyst used to bring about “more authoritarian control” which ‘sticks’ and even “intensifies”.
So what is so interesting about this document and who wrote it, is that The Rockefeller Foundation is one of the main funders of the World Economic Forum that is implementing Agenda 2030/Sustainable Development Goals/New World Order. To change the world into Global Governance (New World Order), a world crisis needs to occur to move into “The Great Reset”. Eeeerily similar to this 2010 document written by these same GLOBALISTS funding the UN & Global Governance. This is a simple connect the dots.
Just a snippet of info about the Rockefellers: The Rockefeller family has been in the forefront of eugenics-the science of population control, since 1902. In 1952, David Rockefeller’s eldest brother John established the Population Council. In the subsequent decades, the eugenics program developed, tested, and implemented various bio-warfare tools, as a means of controlling population growth. Since then, efforts at creating the necessary infrastructure, research bodies, lab testing and experimentations, have proceeded till the present day. By the end of 1945, the dominant force in America was the 5 Rockefeller brothers. Their mandate was to take control of the entire globe, and to eliminate any rivals on its quest for global dominance.
“This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.”
Take a good look at the symbols for Agenda 2030 as they now appear EVERYWHERE:
In detail, the SDGs are explained here:
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
THE INITIATION OF AGENDA 2030:
Key development in June 2019 – PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN UN AND WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM:
The United Nations entered into a strategic partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) in June 2019. Their partnership was formulated to carrying out Agenda 2030 over the course of a decade. A summary of their partnership reads as follows:
“Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future,”
Klaus Schwab, World Economic Founder & Executive Chairman.
“The new Strategic Partnership Framework between the United Nations and the World Economic Forum has great potential to advance our efforts on key global challenges and opportunities, from climate change, health and education to gender equality, digital cooperation and financing for sustainable development. Rooted in UN norms and values, the Framework underscores the invaluable role of the private sector in this work – and points the way toward action to generate shared prosperity on a healthy planet while leaving no one behind,”
António Guterres, UN Secretary General.
The Gates FoundatiON:
Bill Gates face is everywhere lately. He seems to be the mouthpiece of the collective globalist agenda, spearheading the vaccine initiative, as well as making commentary on climate change, Bitcoin and smart cities – amongst other things.
Bill and Melinda Gates started the Gates Foundation and as far back as February 2000, pledged $750 Million to a Global Fund to the benefit of the UN, UN-linked World Health Organization and UNICEF – with funds earmarked for vaccines. The announcement of the donation was made at a WEF event:
John Hopkins University:
Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation have made nearly $100 Million in donations to various initiatives to John Hopkins University, beginning in 1997. The university is one of the oldest most prestigious medical schools in the world. A summary of these charitable contributions can be viewed here: Gates Foundation and John Hopkins University
From the John Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health came the think-tank the Center for Health Security.
October 2019, the John Hopkins Center for Health Security, under the guidance of the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, hosted Event 201. On the Center for Health Security website, Events 201 is described as follows:
“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.
“in recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events, amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing, and they are disruptive to health, economies, and society. Managing these events already strains global capacity, even absent a pandemic threat. Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
-Center for Health Security, 2019
Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft. Microsoft made an investment in Facebook in 2007, years prior to Facebook’s IPO. The investment was $240 Million. At the time, Dustin Moscovitz was still materially involved at the executive levels of Facebook.
Event 201 was supported by funding from the Open Philanthropy Project, a not-for-profit foundation chaired by one of Facebook’s founders and owners, Dustin Moscovitz.
The Open Philanthropy Project recommended a grant of $16 million over three years to the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (CHS) to provide general operating support, to support its domestic and international work on health security and public health preparedness, and to fund an initiative focused on potential global catastrophic risks (GCRs) posed by pandemic pathogens.
THE PANDEMIC BEGINS – DECEMBER 2019:
Taking a lookback at the Rockefeller document, the entire benefit of the pandemic would be economic, social and academic lockdowns around the world:
THE DECIMATION OF THE MIDDLE CLASS:
We all know of the endless microcosms as to the effect the lockdowns have had in terms of eviscerating the workling class. What I found fascinating are these two articles, published a day apart, in the same publication, Business Insider:
$3.7 vs $3.9 trillion – WEALTH TRANSFER IN PLAIN SIGHT. THIS IS WHAT THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF THE LOCKDOWNS OF SMALL AND MIDSIZE BUSINESSES DURING SCAMDEMIC HAS BEEN.
It runs much deeper. The underbelly of the Great Reset is a shift from the past 100+/- years of a fiat currency based global system of debt-laden, consumerist capitalism – which I firmly believe that in the past three decades of the internet and world wide web made open to the common public – this information age has exposed that the “rulers of the world” are the globalist/elitist/ZIONIST money changing families that have pilfered all the natural, needed and precious resources from the people in exchange of this worthless debt-based system of credit which uses currency – fiat – which has no intrinsic value. The system was coming down in 1986, again in 2001, heavy exposure in the 2008 “crisis” and the blackhole of FOREVER-DEBT is all a huge SCAM.
Therefore – with Agenda 2030, which is being spearheaded into place by the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset – a new paradigm of VALUE is being manufactured by the UN’s many programs, the IMF, the Bank of International Settlements, the mega-investment firms (BlackRock, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs), the critical global consulting firms (McKinsey, Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG, E&Y, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, etc), the powerful think tanks (Brookings Institution, the Chatham House, Council on Foreign Relations) and on and on….this new measure of value will be determined by a yet to be finalized set of SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS. However, provided are the UNITED NATION’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME FINANCE INITITATIVE’s cute little pamphlet on how banks will become signatories for the Sustainable Development Goals.
This would all seem like fluff – only – the sentiment of (((Western Democracies))) is to capitulate to the BIG BAD CLIMATE CHANGE EXTINCTION EVENT which is inevitable unless a ONE WORLD CULTURE emerges that will acquiesce and give in to the climate change atomwaffen blast that is inevitable.
Check out policy papers by corporations, think tanks, NGOs, governments far and wide, etc etc
Deloitte with the WEF:
CHINA will lead the way:
RESCUE NGO MEME’S REFUGEES WITH CLIMATE CHANGE:
Petronas – gayOped
McKinsey (STATING PANDEMIC WILL LAST 18 MONTHS:
The Economist (Rothschild Consortium publication)
I have found over one thousand documents all regurgitating the same shit. Over the span of two decades.
With so much money flowing into securities deemed compatible with environmental, social and governance standards, the risk of asset managers disingenuously promoting their offerings as being ESG compliant is high and rising. Unfortunately, new European Union rules designed to delineate the industry’s performance will likely lead to more greenwashing, not less.
Last week, Tariq Fancy, the former chief investment officer for sustainable investing at BlackRock Inc., the world’s biggest asset manager overseeing $8.7 trillion, castigated the industry’s duplicity, in an article for USA Today:
“In truth, sustainable investing boils down to little more than marketing hype, PR spin and disingenuous promises from the investment community. Existing mutual funds are cynically rebranded as ‘green’ — with no discernible change to the fund itself or its underlying strategies — simply for the sake of appearances and marketing purposes.”
The numbers back him up. According to data compiled by Morningstar Inc., more than 250 existing European funds changed their investment objectives to adopt an ESG stance last year, with almost all of them rebranding to reflect the purported change. Color me skeptical: With ESG funds pulling in almost 100 billion euros ($120 billion) of new new money in the fourth quarter, which Morningstar reckons was 45% of total fund inflows, the temptation to stick an ESG badge on all funds is proving irresistible.
Earlier this month, the EU introduced the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, a suite of rules aimed at policing how the fund management industry deals with the climate emergency. The aim is laudable; but the law of unintended consequences means the attempt at codification is likely to backfire.
The new rules basically create three classifications of European funds. One category — Article 9 in the taxonomy — is designed to encapsulate what are commonly called impact funds, where the objective is to proactively allocate capital to projects such as renewable energy or health care or clean water. Also dubbed “dark green” investments, these comprise the smallest and most intensive category of ESG products.
The second designation — Article 8 — covers the remaining “light green” ESG suite, or funds that have “environmental or social characteristics.” That would cover products that exclude some securities based on their environmental unfriendliness or other criteria deemed unacceptable.
The rest of the fund universe should fall into the Article 6 grade, designed to encompass investments that ignore any and all of the criteria that their ESG brethren take into account when deciding what to buy.
But there’s a problem. In the current investing climate, there’s absolutely no incentive for a salesforce to pitch an Article 6 fund to a customer. Asset allocation committees want to be seen doing the right thing, so any funds that are not explicitly ESG-friendly effectively become market pariahs. This creates a strong temptation to classify all funds under Article 8, even if they’re measured against non-ESG benchmarks and their securities selections don’t take such concerns into account.
David Czupryna, the Paris-based head of ESG development at Candriam, which manages about $143 billion in assets, says that the aim of the three-pronged classification, and the accompanying rules on mandatory disclosures, was to “dissuade would-be half-hearted ESG asset managers from emphasizing sustainability.” By setting a high enough bar for Article 8 and 9 funds, only truly sustainable portfolios would qualify. However, fear of missing out on the cash flowing into green funds can also incentivize playing fast and loose with the rules.
Fancy, the former BlackRock executive, argues that the marketing efforts of the asset management industry are “a placebo” for addressing the climate crisis and shouldn’t replacegovernment action. “A ‘free market’ will not correct itself or fix the problem by its own accord,” he wrote.
It would be a shame if the EU’s genuine attempt to impose some order on the green funds landscape, which is currently a bit of a Wild West,backfires. But as Huw van Steenis, the chairman of sustainable finance at UBS AG, wrote for Bloomberg Opinion last week, the bloc’s methodology is both too strict and too broad, excluding some investments that should be deemed green as well as firms that are becoming more carbon neutral.
Given that every asset manager claims to have ESG at the heart of their investment process these days, they can claim to qualify as Article 8 under the new taxonomy. People seeking to do no harm with their cash will need to be even more vigilant in ensuring their funds are really as green as they say they are.
In my previous post, I covered the obvious roles of the World Economic Forum and Council on Foreign Relations in the Great Reset/Agenda 2030/17 SDGs, so I want to focus on Larry Fink and BlackRock.
From the website:
BlackRock is one of the world’s leading providers of investment, advisory and risk management solutions.
BlackRock offers a range of solutions — from rigorous fundamental and quantitative active management approaches aimed at maximizing outperformance to highly efficient indexing strategies designed to gain broad exposure to the world’s capital markets. Our clients can access our investment solutions through a variety of product structures, including individual and institutional separate accounts, mutual funds and other pooled investment vehicles, and the industry-leading iShares® ETFs.
The foundation of BlackRock’s business is our belief that our clients’ needs are of paramount importance. Our commitment to investment excellence is anchored in a shared culture that always places a client’s interests first, from individual investors to the world’s largest institutions. We act always as a fiduciary for our clients, never trading as a principal on our own behalf.
BlackRock’s investment approach is based on our conviction that we can combine our market insights, our global reach and scale, our proprietary technology, our culture of information sharing and our unwavering focus on risk management into an ability to deliver performance in all market environments. BlackRock is committed to providing a broad set of investment solutions for our clients, striving to achieve the best balance between risk and opportunity.
BlackRock is a truly global firm that combines the benefits of worldwide reach with local service and relationships. We manage assets for clients in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, the Middle East and Africa. The firm employs approximately 13,000 talented professionals and maintains offices in more than 30 countries around the world. Our client base includes corporate, public, union and industry pension plans; governments; insurance companies; third-party mutual funds; endowments; foundations; charities; corporations; official institutions; sovereign wealth funds; banks; financial professionals; and individuals worldwide.
As of June 30, 2019, BlackRock’s assets under management total US$6.84 trillion across equity, fixed income, cash management, alternative investment, real estate and advisory strategies. Through BlackRock Solutions® — the natural evolution of our long-standing investment in developing sophisticated and highly integrated systems — we offer risk management, strategic advisory and enterprise investment system services to a broad base of clients.
Our firm’s ownership structure is designed to maintain the independence we believe is necessary to retain our commitments to client focus and investment excellence. BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE: BLK) has no single majority stockholder and has a majority of independent directors.
BlackRock – instituting a new methodology for the guidance of their investment products.
Bank of Greece
Her Majesty’s Treasury
Central Bank of Ireland
Federal Reserve Bank of NY
Since the onset of the pandemic, a lot of BlackRock’s public releases include how they are crafting their business model for Sustainable Investing around this type of Cause/Effect scheme:
Shifting Economic Power
The political sphere of influence could shift from Washington to Beijing
Businesses could become more powerful than countries
We’re all going to need to talk Mandarin
Climate Change and Resource Scarcity
Western diets will become increasingly plant-based
Renewable energy will fully replace fossil fuels
Technological advancement will yield man-made materials
Demographics and Social Change
Substantial healthcare spending will create huge opportunity in this sector
Robots will replace people to plug the labour gap
People will need more money to fund a lengthy retirement
A whole new city infrastructure could be required
Car ownership will become obsolete as autonomous, summon-able cars become mainstream
The healthcare system will need to change to cope with demand
All as a result of:
Traditional consumer goods produced by technology companies
The global economy should grow as the world becomes more productive
Technology will enable solutions to climate change and population problems
MuunyayoSPECULATION: The above five areas foreshadow the elements we see within the Great Reset, namely:
China becoming the world’s economic center of power.
Diets consisting of plant-based foods (and BUGS!)
Phasing out fossil fuels (highly unrealistic).
Automation decimating what’s left of the working class.
The coming UN Smart Cities program.
Again, the meme’ing together of climate change and population growth. That is, migration as a human right. This is embedded within the UN’s policies for the past decade.
Prior to the pandemic, BlackRock adapted “Sustainability” as their catechism for Investing.
“A framework for incorporating sustainable investing in portfolio construction”
“Sustainability effects and societal attitudes will impact all assets and therefore the whole portfolio. The direct impacts of climate change and the coming capital reallocation will reshape economic fundamentals, expected returns and assessments of risk.”
Climate change is the unifier, combating climate change – as it has been appointed the boogeyman since Agenda 21 was first unveiled in 1992. Climate change/action is ubiquitous – it was on Biden’s platform, it is part of thousands of corporate MD&A disclosures in official SEC filings, the foundations, the think-tanks, public education, public health, local news, national news…it is safe to say that Climate Change is the underlying threat used by all entities entangled within the decision making capacity of the Great Reset which will ultimately drive the people of planet earth into the arms of Communitarianism and a One World Order.
Reshape Economic Fundamentals – this is a generic term for the coming Stakeholder Capitalism that is baked into every facet of the Great Reset. BlackRock has $8.676 Trillion USD in Assets Under Management. They are a leader in the Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) realm. Larry Fink, Founder, Chairman and CEO, is on the Board of the World Economic Forum. Make no mistake – BlackRock is a crucial driving force behind the execution of the Great Reset.
Check out the fear porn:
May 2020 – Progress Report on the Valuation Metrics Considered in Sustainable Investments:
“The concept of sustainable investing can mean different things. Asset owners and asset managers often operate with multiple definitions, messages and motivations. BlackRock operates from a simple definition of sustainable investing: Combining traditional investing with environmental, social, and governance-related (ESG) insights to improve long-term outcomes for our clients. Our view: Companies with strong profiles on material sustainability issues have potential to outperform those with poor profiles. In particular, we believe companies managed with a focus on sustainability should be better positioned versus their less sustainable peers to weather adverse conditions while still benefiting from positive market environments.”
“In order to account for this heterogeneity by sectors, descriptors need to be weighted appropriately by their relative importance in each sector before they are summed up to form the final score under our research framework. For example, the score of a company in the Financial sector – which would not be a comparatively significant carbon emitter or consumer – is weighed heavily in favor of social and governance issues, and marginally on environmental issues. Such a weighting scheme has been described by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) as a Materiality Map. Our framework relies on the views expressed in the SASB Materiality Map® but also augments them by overlaying additional data.”
December 2020 – BlackRock ESG Integration Statement (updated from 2018)
Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance metrics (ESGs)
ESG– Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance refers to the three central factors in measuring the sustainability and societal impact of an investment in a company or business.
Take a close look at the subject matter contained within the three metrics. The criteria ties directly to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals set forward by UN Agenda 2030 which has been launched by the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset – of which BlackRock is a major player.
In essence, the ESGs are the implementation of the SDGs in the sphere of industry, markets and commerce. Multinational corporations will carry out their ESGs which will concurrently create the structural changes called for in the Great Reset. BlackRock is at the heart of this.
Takeaway from the Document:
“BlackRock’s approach to ESG integration At BlackRock, we have always focused on helping our clients try to reach their long-term investment goals by providing resilient and well-constructed portfolios. Our investment conviction is that sustainability-and climate-integrated portfolios can provide better risk-adjusted returns to investors over the long-term, and that sustainability-related data provides an increasingly important set of tools to identify unpriced risks and opportunities within portfolios. BlackRock’s active investors are responsible for integrating material sustainability-related insights, consistent with their existing investment process, with the objective of improving long-term risk-adjusted returns. BlackRock’s firm-wide investment process is structured to identify ESG risks and opportunities alongside traditional measures within our active investment processes. ESG integration is part of both our active investment process and index investment processes and oversight. BlackRock has a consistent framework for ESG integration that also permits a diversity of approaches across different investment teams and strategies. ESG considerations that are material will vary by client objectives, investment style, sector, and market trends. Sustainability measures help inform the due diligence, portfolio construction, and monitoring processes of our active and alternatives platforms, as well as our approach to risk management. In our index investments business, we work with index providers to expand and improve the universe of sustainable indexes, and our investment stewardship processes encourage the companies in which our clients are invested to manage and disclose material sustainability risks effectively.”
MUUNYAYO’S ANALYSIS: I worked as a CPA for 20 years and audited companies within the same size and scope as BlackRock. This is all a load of horseshit….BlackRock’s fossil fuels investments look something like this:
For Fink and BlackRock, they benefit by participating in the rollout of the “The Great Reset” because for them, outside of their physical holdings in fossil fuels – Exchange-Traded Funds ARE a HUGE SCAM to use CLIMATE CHANGE ACTION as a method to erase the MASSIVE ENOURMOUS REAL FINANCIAL BLACK HOLE OF NOTHINGNESS THAT EXISTS IN THE WORLD OF ETFs.
There is more funk with Fink that we can get into another time. This man makes me sick. I am not a professional researcher, nor journalist, nor author, nor any of that shit. I just want to make blog posts that are informative. And give some insight into the people and entities that are making the Great Reset a reality.
In a very distant past…the fuckery that is the Globalist-Zionist-Supra-Technocratic Regime, a more bold response would be in high order….sword time…wolf time…..war time….